The
Key Factors
·No time today to give individual
case studies
-The following is based on success in the UK, Chile, the Netherlands
and Australia
·The key factors, as shown by international success in developing
efficient water services, are
Separation of policy, regulation and delivery
-Transparency
-Independent regulation
-An integrated planning process
-Performance measures
-Licence or contract review
|
Separation
of Policy, Regulation and Delivery
·Government’s role is policy
·Governments generally not good at operations
·Regulation needs to be separate from policy in
-Implementation of policy
-Enforcement of regulations
-Providing independence
·Delivery requires efficient operations, overseen by independent
regulator
|
|
7
|
8
|
Transparency
·Essential to allow open discussion on
policies
·Requires independent and open reporting on water service provider
performance
·Consumers are the customers and need to have their input
-Through public consultation on policies
-Through receiving the facts
-Through being able to seek compensation
|
Transparency
·Deficiencies are less likely
to occur if there is transparency with everyone knowing that failures,
or misuse of funds, will be identified and reported
·Such transparency requires the use of independent regulators
which can take many forms
·Independent regulators, in effect, give power back to the community,
especially if there is consultation on standards and on ability
and willingness to pay
|
|
9
|
10
|
Regulatory System Requirements
·Political leadership with
clarity of responsibilities
·Community consultation involving all stakeholders
·Clear objectives and specific measures to monitor progress and
achievement
·Quality standards with
-controls over water abstraction
-published drinking water standards, either numerical or treatment
standards
-effluent discharge controls
·Freedom to report openly and fully
|
Monitoring and Enforcement
·There needs to be monitoring
and enforcement of
-Drinking water quality
-Other service standards
-Effluent discharges
-Completion of contracted improvement programmes
·Regulators should have enforcement powers with there being
incentives and/or penalties for non-compliance
·Local Authorities cannot abdicate responsibility for the deliverables
through contracting out to the private sector
-The Local Authorities remain responsible
-The PPP contracts are their means of defining and monitoring
the deliverables
|
|
11
|
12
|